Governance‎ > ‎Fiscal policy‎ > ‎Tax‎ > ‎What does tax pay for?‎ > ‎Support‎ > ‎

Natural Disaster

  1. Geological disasters
     Avalanches
     Earthquakes
     Volcanic eruptions
  2. Hydrological disasters
     Floods
     Limnic eruptions
     Tsunamis
  3. Meteorological disasters
     Blizzards
     Cyclonic storms
     Droughts
     Hailstorms
     Heat waves
     Tornadoes
  4. Fires
  5. Health disasters
     Epidemics
  6. Space disasters
     Impact events
     Solar flares
     Gamma ray burst

Should the government take care of natural disasters?

  • Not in a free society, that's what insurance is for, why should someone further inland pay for my beach house when it is ruined.
  • The way to resolve this is insurance, and if the insurance company won't sell you insurance that is an important signal its too dangerous, why dump that on the tax payer?
  • It doesn't make economic sense, it doesn't make good moral sense, it doesn't follow the rule of law - you are responsible for your own property.

Ron Paul Speaks out on disaster recovery


You can't buy private insurance for the house on the beach because it is too expensive and you live elsewhere.
So they tax you to living away from the beach cover the house that has been bought near the beach. When the house gets damaged due to natural disaster they say you don't care about the people suffering from the natural disaster. 
The fact that they can't buy insurance gives them a very important economic lesson that they shouldn't buy the house on the beach.

Ron Paul talks about Government bailouts to those in disasters



Comments